... frankly speaking

Frankly speaking

Klartext by Textination

We ask ... and you speak plain languageI

In our Frankly Speaking section, decision-makers can give their views on various topics in short interviews: concise, to the point and without prevarication.

The range of possible topics is broad - the only important thing is that the interview partners clearly state their position - in other words, speak frankly.

If you are a fan of plain speaking and have a topic suggestion, feel free to contact us: news@textination.de.

 

20.06.2023

"DOMOTEX is and will remain the home of the entire industry"

Frankly speaking with Frau Sonia Wedell-Castellano, Global Director DOMOTEX Events the trade fair landscape for floor coverings in Germany

The effects of the Corona pandemic were felt in almost all areas of social and economic life. The trade fair industry in particular was severely affected, with many events cancelled or postponed. With the return to normality, the question arises as to what significance leading trade fairs will have in the post-Corona era and how the competition between different organisers will develop. For its KLARTEXT interview series, Textination talked to Ms Sonia Wedell-Castellano, Global Director of DOMOTEX Events.

 

After DOMOTEX was unable to take place in 2021 and 2022 due to the pandemic, the trade fair returned in 2023 with a successful event. Nevertheless, the number of exhibitors has almost halved compared to 2020. How do you assess the future importance of leading trade fairs after the industry had to come to terms with online meetings and travel restrictions for a long period of time?

Frankly speaking with Frau Sonia Wedell-Castellano, Global Director DOMOTEX Events the trade fair landscape for floor coverings in Germany

The effects of the Corona pandemic were felt in almost all areas of social and economic life. The trade fair industry in particular was severely affected, with many events cancelled or postponed. With the return to normality, the question arises as to what significance leading trade fairs will have in the post-Corona era and how the competition between different organisers will develop. For its KLARTEXT interview series, Textination talked to Ms Sonia Wedell-Castellano, Global Director of DOMOTEX Events.

 

After DOMOTEX was unable to take place in 2021 and 2022 due to the pandemic, the trade fair returned in 2023 with a successful event. Nevertheless, the number of exhibitors has almost halved compared to 2020. How do you assess the future importance of leading trade fairs after the industry had to come to terms with online meetings and travel restrictions for a long period of time?

I think it is important to remember that this was the first DOMOTEX since the outbreak of the pandemic, and at a time when the global economic situation is rather difficult. Of course, this situation has made some companies reluctant to participate in DOMOTEX 2023, so we have not yet been able to welcome all companies back as exhibitors at the show. In addition, there were still significant travel restrictions in place at the beginning of the year, for example in China, which simply made it more difficult for our exhibitors to participate in a trade fair abroad. As far as our expectations for the next event are concerned, I can say that many companies - even those that did not exhibit this year - have communicated their interest in wanting to be back at DOMOTEX 2024.
 
We are certain that leading trade fairs and exhibitions in general will continue to be of great importance in the future! You may be able to cultivate existing customers at digital events, but you can't generate new ones. The focus of DOMOTEX is on products you can touch, on the haptic experience on site. You can't transfer that to the digital world. Even the chance encounters at the stand or in the halls do not happen digitally. But a trade fair thrives on personal encounters, personal exchanges. Business is done between people, not between screens. Both exhibitors and visitors have told us quite clearly that they want and need DOMOTEX to be a trade fair where people are present.

 

The degree of internationalisation among DOMOTEX visitors was between 62 and 67 percent in the last three years of the event before the pandemic; in 2023 it even reached 69 percent. Would you agree that leading international trade fairs in Germany are now primarily only important for export-oriented companies? And what does that imply for the economic efficiency of trade fairs?

Certainly, leading international trade fairs in Germany are particularly interesting for export-oriented companies, but not exclusively. That doesn't change anything at all about the profitability of trade fairs. We generate our turnover with all our exhibitors, regardless of whether they are export-oriented or only interested in the Germany-Austria-Switzerland region. That's why satisfied exhibitors are very important to us. And an exhibitor is satisfied when he can do good business or make good contacts at our fairs. It's more and more about the right quality of visitors, less about the quantity. In any case, all our exhibitors very much welcome international visitors!

 

For the 2024 edition, Deutsche Messe has announced that its DOMOTEX concept has been changed to focus on different areas each year: Carpet & Rugs in the odd-numbered years and Flooring in the even-numbered years. Flooring covers wood and laminate flooring, parquet, design flooring, resilient floor coverings, carpets, outdoor flooring and application and installation technology. Carpet & Rugs stands for hand-made carpets and runners as well as for machine-woven carpets.

Yet you say that the Carpet & Rugs segment in particular needs an annual presentation platform, while the flooring segment would like to see DOMOTEX every two years as the central platform for the industry due to longer innovation cycles. Doesn't that actually mean that floor coverings are only in Hannover every other year, but carpets continue to exhibit annually in Hannover? Could you clarify that?

DOMOTEX - Home of Flooring will take place in 2024 and in all even years: This is a DOMOTEX with all exhibitors as we know them from the past. So, from herringbone parquet to outdoor coverings, oriental carpets and contemporary designs - everything, under one roof. In the odd years, i.e. from 2025, there will then be DOMOTEX - Home of Carpets and Rugs, with a focus on suppliers of fitted carpets. The background to this is that the hard flooring industry had wanted DOMOTEX to be held every two years. After this year's DOMOTEX, the suppliers of wall-to-wall carpets have again clearly spoken out in favour of an annual platform. With our new focus model, we are meeting the needs that the market has expressed to us.

 

Messe Frankfurt has declared a new product segment for next year's Heimtextil - interestingly, under the name Carpets & Rugs. While the watchword at DOMOTEX in the even year 2024 is Flooring, Heimtextil offers an alternative trade fair venue for carpets. How do you assess this situation - do exhibitors now have to choose between Hannover and Frankfurt and what does this mean for the split concept?

No, exhibitors from the carpet sector will not have to choose between Hannover and Frankfurt in future - because DOMOTEX is and will remain the home of the entire industry, even in the even years! At DOMOTEX, Home of Flooring means, as I explained earlier, that we present the entire spectrum of floor coverings and carpets. But what is even more important is that we have been told by exhibitors and many visitors that the market does not want to be split up any further. Through the many (small) events, the flooring industry is only competing with itself. To put it bluntly: if only some of the exhibitors take part in ten events, it can't really work. The critical mass is missing. A trade fair is only as good as its participants and they often don't have the time to visit several events.    

 

Another innovation for DOMOTEX is the country focus. What do you expect from this and why did you choose "Insight Italy" for 2024?

With our new special presentation, we want to arouse the curiosity of our visitors - especially retailers, architects and contractors - and highlight the international character of DOMOTEX. After all, what could be more exciting than getting to know a country in depth?  

That is why the INSIGHT concept will in future feature a different country at each DOMOTEX - Home of Flooring. Special exhibition areas will showcase innovations and products, present partnerships with designers and universities, and stage trends. In addition, the conference will provide insights into the respective market and references.  
In 2024, we will start with Italy, a very design-savvy and creative country from which many trends come.

 

Deutsche Messe wants to strengthen the Hannover venue for the leading trade fair DOMOTEX and to hold additional fairs only in Shanghai and in Gaziantep. There will be no Carpet Expo in Istanbul. What influence does the changing entrepreneurial landscape in terms of production countries and markets have on your international concept?

First of all, it must be noted that the business landscape for carpets has not changed in Turkey. Here, only the associations have decided to organise a carpet fair in Istanbul in the future. The background is the continuing visa problem for Turkish exhibitors in Germany as well as the immensely high inflation in Turkey, which makes foreign participation extremely costly for Turkish companies. We would have liked to organise a carpet fair in Istanbul together with the Turkish associations, but not at any price and not on their terms alone. Hannover is and will remain the international platform for DOMOTEX, and we will continue to strengthen this location.

But of course, we also keep an eye on the global market and keep our eyes and ears open at all times, for all our brands, by the way. It was only in this way that DOMOTEX asia/Chinafloor in Shanghai was able to develop into what is now a very successful event. The potential was there, we were in the right place at the right time. If we hadn't seized the opportunity at the time, there would still be a strong floor coverings trade fair in Shanghai - but it would be run by one of our competitors and it wouldn't be called DOMOTEX today.

Many thanks to Ms Sonia Wedell-Castellano for the KLARTEXT.

05.04.2023

Our policy is degenerating into a prohibition policy - less is more

Frankly speaking with Dr Wilhelm Rauch, managing director of Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser, on the situation of man-made fibre production in Germany

Last month, the Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser IVC e.V. published a post on its LinkedIn profile with the title "Dying of the man-made fibre industry picks up speed". Since 31 December 2021, 7 of the 13 fibre producers based in Germany have had to file for insolvency, which has led to the cessation of operations for the majority. For its Frankly speaking interview series, Textination asked Dr Wilhelm Rauch, Managing Director of the association, about the state of man-made fibre production in Germany.

In the name of your association, Industrievereinigung der Chemiefaserindustrie (Association of the Chemical Fibre Industry), the bad C-word continues to be an ingredient. In times when everything per se that comes from nature is good and everything that comes from a laboratory is bad, is that courageous - or perhaps even damaging to business?
Have you never been tempted to remove the "chemistry" from the name?

Frankly speaking with Dr Wilhelm Rauch, managing director of Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser, on the situation of man-made fibre production in Germany

Last month, the Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser IVC e.V. published a post on its LinkedIn profile with the title "Dying of the man-made fibre industry picks up speed". Since 31 December 2021, 7 of the 13 fibre producers based in Germany have had to file for insolvency, which has led to the cessation of operations for the majority. For its Frankly speaking interview series, Textination asked Dr Wilhelm Rauch, Managing Director of the association, about the state of man-made fibre production in Germany.

In the name of your association, Industrievereinigung der Chemiefaserindustrie (Association of the Chemical Fibre Industry), the bad C-word continues to be an ingredient. In times when everything per se that comes from nature is good and everything that comes from a laboratory is bad, is that courageous - or perhaps even damaging to business?
Have you never been tempted to remove the "chemistry" from the name?

The temptation to change the name in line with the mainstream is naturally given in this day and age. Ultimately, it is up to the IVC member companies to decide. If the term "man-made fibres" is economically more successful, this is certainly an argument for a company. However, this would not change the scientific-technical basis of synthetic and cellulosic fibres - both are the result of chemical processes. By the way, this also applies to natural fibres - the whole of nature is based exclusively on physical-chemical processes. That is why chemistry belongs to the natural sciences.
 

It is not only in the recent past that a lot of commitment and money has been put into researching fibres to replace those made from fossil raw materials as soon as possible. What is your opinion on this?

Any research into new fibres is welcome. The focus is on substitutes for existing fibres as well as new areas of application. However, turning away from fossil raw materials does not necessarily mean turning exclusively to renewable raw materials. Synthetic man-made fibres can serve as CO2 sinks in the future. I am thinking here of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and subsequently of products from syntheses similar to the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, which are possible with recently developed new catalysts directly with CO2 and green hydrogen. These could then be tailor-made raw materials for future man-made fibres. For despite all the enthusiasm for renewable raw materials, one should not lose sight of the environmental burdens that can be associated with them: for example, loss of arable land for food, water requirements, monocultures, etc.

 

It was not long ago that the term "systemically relevant" made the rounds. In which areas is the man-made fibre industry absolutely system-relevant, i.e. indispensable?

Man-made fibres are essential components of computers, batteries, smartphones, wind turbines, protective clothing and medical products.

 

How do you see the manifold regulations of industrial fibre production by European and German authorities? Is Germany still an industrial country?

Politicians seem to be increasingly taking great efforts to worsen the framework conditions for economic production in Europe to such an extent that investments in other parts of the world are becoming more interesting at such a rate that we are left behind. Currently, we only have the Deutsches Museum in Munich, but I increasingly see the danger that soon the whole of Germany will become a museum.    

 

From a security and economic point of view, how do you assess Europe's already existing dependence on primarily Asian suppliers for man-made fibres? What gives you the biggest headaches in this respect?

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has shown what consequences dependencies can cause. The conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, which was fought with military means, also showed us how vulnerable our economy is. However, both cases have also proven that we are capable of developing a certain flexibility in politics to counter such challenges. If we look at possible military conflicts in the South China Sea and a resulting confrontation between China and the Western economic world, we can expect consequences of a different magnitude. Europe would then have to concentrate more on its own industrial capacities.

 

If you could give a speech to the European Parliament or the German Bundestag - what would you like to point out emphatically to those politically responsible in matters concerning the man-made fibres industry?

Daring more democracy. Willy Brand formulated this sentence in his first government declaration as Federal Chancellor in 1969. It still applies. In concrete terms, it means that the legislature must ensure that projects are given sufficient time to be commented on, so that experts can respond in a serious and well-founded manner. A few days are simply too short and give the impression of wanting to push through such projects without public participation. Statements are an act of living democracy. Politicians should not be afraid of this, but should look at comments constructively in order to pass solid laws, regulations and guidelines that those involved will also support.

Less is more. Fewer laws and regulations must be enacted, but they must be of superior quality. It must be possible to implement legal regulations in companies, which brings us back to the issue of time. Implementation in practice must be lived. Sometimes investments are necessary to comply with legislative changes. Today, one gets the impression that laws are passed in a staccato manner without first having discussed the consequences with experts. However, the economy is not a computer game in which you can influence the actions of the game characters and thus the entire course of the game in a fraction of a second. We as industry, but also as citizens, increasingly feel like such game pieces. Changing this situation is a responsible task of politics.

Dare more market economy. Our policies - be they national or European - increasingly bear traits of a planned economy. This is particularly evident in the energy and environmental sectors. A look around the world shows, however, that environmental protection is best advanced where the market economy is the driving force. The USA are not usually associated with a state with special ambitions for environmental and climate protection. Nevertheless, the USA in particular has significantly reduced CO2 emissions in recent years, whereas they have increased in China. Germany's very meticulously constructed system for building up non-fossil energy producers - the most expensive in the world, by the way - has also failed miserably here in terms of emissions.  

Encouragement instead of bans. Our policy is degenerating into a policy of prohibition. How do you react to bans? You concentrate your energy on finding loopholes to get around them. You want to be the last to be hit by a ban. What we need is an incentive policy. Incentives create competition, and in competition everyone wants to be first. Energies used in a competition are always constructively focused on the goal. Here, European policy can learn a lot from the USA.

Many thanks to Dr Wilhelm Rauch for frankly speaking..